ModelOps Market

ModelOps Market Size, Share, Growth Analysis, By Offering (Platforms & Services), Application (CI/CD, Monitoring & Alerting), Model Type (ML Model, Graph Model, Agent-based Model), Vertical and Region - Global Industry Forecast to 2029

Report Code: TC 9051 Jun, 2024, by marketsandmarkets.com

[380 Pages Report] The global ModelOps Market is projected to grow from USD 5.4 billion in 2024 to USD 29.5 billion in 2029, at a CAGR of 40.2% during the forecast period. In today's digital world, the increase in data volume is a crucial requirement for advanced analytics solutions to process, analyze, and interpret vast datasets efficiently. ModelOps is crucial in modern data-driven businesses for several reasons. It ensures that machine learning models, which are often complex and sensitive to changes in data and environment, continue to perform accurately and reliably in production. By implementing rigorous deployment, monitoring, and maintenance practices through ModelOps, organizations can minimize the risk of model degradation and ensure consistent performance over time.

ModelOps Market Market

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

ModelOps Market Market Opportunities

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Dynamics

Driver: Integration of ModelOps with DevOps and DataOps

Integrating ModelOps with established DevOps and DataOps practices represents a significant market driver by fostering a seamless pipeline for developing, deploying, and monitoring machine learning models. This harmonization streamlines workflows and bridges the traditionally separate domains of data science and IT operations. Organizations can reduce time-to-market, minimize errors, and enhance model reliability by automating the lifecycle from model development to production deployment. Continuous monitoring and maintenance, crucial for adapting to evolving data patterns, benefits from DevOps' robust monitoring capabilities and DataOps' focus on data quality and governance. This integration allows data scientists to concentrate on refining models while IT teams ensure effective deployment and maintenance, enhancing productivity and aligning models with business objectives. Additionally, it supports scalability, enabling efficient management of increasing models and data sources, crucial for driving innovation and competitive advantage through advanced analytics. Thus, integrating ModelOps with DevOps and DataOps practices is a key market driver that enhances operational efficiency, ensures continuous model performance, and fosters collaboration between data science and IT operations.

Restraint: Model interpretability and explainability

Integrating machine learning models into decision-making processes necessitates a robust understanding of their operations, fueling the demand for interpretability and explainability. These concepts ensure transparency, trust, and accountability, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare, finance, and criminal justice. However, achieving interpretability without compromising performance is challenging, particularly for complex models such as deep neural networks. These models, known for their high accuracy and ability to handle large, unstructured data, operate as "black boxes," with intricate internal structures and numerous difficult parameters. Simplifying these models to enhance interpretability often leads to a trade-off, reducing their predictive power and effectiveness. Techniques like feature importance analysis, LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), and SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) provide some insights but may still fall short of fully elucidating the decision-making process of highly complex models. Moreover, the reliance on post-hoc interpretability methods can introduce another layer of approximation, potentially leading to misinterpretations. Balancing the dual objectives of interpretability and performance requires innovative approaches, such as developing inherently interpretable models or integrating interpretability directly into the design phase of complex models. However, these solutions are still evolving and often necessitate a compromise, highlighting an ongoing restraint in the practical deployment of sophisticated machine learning systems in real-world decision-making scenarios. This underscores the need for continued research and development in methods that enhance model transparency without significantly diminishing performance capabilities.

Opportunity: Integration of automated Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines

The integration of automated Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines for machine learning models is revolutionizing the ModelOps market, which focuses on the operationalization and management of these models. By streamlining the processes of testing, validating, and deploying models, automated CI/CD pipelines reduce human intervention and errors, accelerating the time-to-market and enhancing the reliability and performance of AI solutions. Continuous integration ensures robust models through automatic testing of every change, while continuous deployment facilitates rapid updates, enabling quick adaptation to business needs. Containerization technologies like Docker and Kubernetes further enhance scalability and reproducibility; Docker packages models with dependencies for consistent performance across environments, and Kubernetes efficiently manages resources and scaling. These capabilities enable organizations to operationalize AI at scale, maintain high model performance, and swiftly respond to new data, ultimately achieving greater and sustained returns on AI investments in a competitive, data-driven world.

Challenge: Challenge due to the intricate dependencies

In ModelOps, ensuring consistent and reproducible environments is particularly challenging due to the intricate dependencies on specific versions of libraries, frameworks, and data sources. Machine learning models rely on numerous frequently updated libraries and frameworks, where version discrepancies can lead to inconsistent model behavior across different environments. This necessitates meticulous dependency management to prevent compatibility issues and unexpected errors during deployment. Additionally, models are trained on specific datasets, which can change over time, complicating the task of maintaining model accuracy with new data. Robust versioning and tracking of data sources are essential to address this. The heterogeneity of development, testing, and production environments—each potentially having different hardware, software configurations, and infrastructure—adds another layer of complexity. Ensuring consistency across these environments is crucial for reliable model performance. Thus, the primary restraint in ModelOps is managing these dependencies to achieve consistent, reproducible, and reliable environments throughout the model lifecycle. This requires robust versioning strategies, automated testing pipelines, and diligent monitoring to ensure seamless operation from development to production.

ModelOps Market Ecosystem

The ModelOps Market ecosystem comprises Platform providers, Model lifecycle management providers, service providers, end users and regulatory bodies. These vendors are equally competent and offer innovative technology bundled with modelOps. This segmented ecosystem works collaboratively to drive the transition toward more efficient workflows and output generation, leveraging technology and data to achieve goals.

Top Companies in ModelOps Market Market

By vertical, BFSI segment accounts for the largest market size during the forecast period.

The BFSI sector leads the ModelOps market mainly due to its deep integration of complex models for critical functions such as risk management, fraud detection, and personalized financial services. These models are pivotal for decision-making and regulatory compliance, making efficient ModelOps practices crucial. BFSI's stringent regulatory environment, including frameworks like Basel III and GDPR, necessitates rigorous model validation and monitoring throughout their lifecycle. This regulatory pressure compels BFSI firms to invest significantly in robust ModelOps solutions to ensure compliance and operational efficiency. Additionally, the scale of operations in BFSI demands sophisticated ModelOps capabilities to manage numerous models across diverse departments and geographies effectively. Centralized management through ModelOps streamlines deployment, version control, and performance monitoring, optimizing operational efficiency and scalability. Moreover, intense competition within BFSI drives firms to leverage advanced analytics and AI-driven insights from models, further propelling the demand for agile and effective ModelOps frameworks.

By application, the monitoring and altering segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period.

The Application Monitoring and Alerting segment leads in the ModelOps market with the highest CAGR due to its critical role in supporting the widespread adoption of AI and machine learning models across various industries. As these models are deployed in real-world applications, continuous monitoring and timely alerts for anomalies are essential to maintain their accuracy and reliability. The complexity of managing the entire model lifecycle—from development and testing to deployment and ongoing operations—further amplifies the need for robust monitoring solutions. These tools optimize operational efficiency by detecting issues early and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards by tracking model behavior and identifying biases. Moreover, they integrate seamlessly with DevOps practices, promoting collaboration between data scientists, engineers, and operations teams. The rapid advancements in explainable AI and model interpretability technologies further emphasize the importance of sophisticated monitoring and alerting capabilities in providing transparent insights into model decisions.

North America to account for the largest market size during the forecast period.

North America dominates the ModelOps market primarily due to its advanced technology infrastructure, including robust cloud computing and analytics platforms, which facilitate efficient deployment and management of machine learning models. The region hosts a concentration of leading global enterprises across diverse industries, driving demand for ModelOps solutions to streamline model deployment and ensure regulatory compliance. Moreover, North America benefits from a supportive regulatory environment and a skilled workforce in data science and machine learning engineering, fostering innovation and adopting ModelOps practices. Academic and research institutions further contribute to the region's leadership by advancing ModelOps methodologies. These factors collectively position North America as a pivotal hub for ModelOps, enabling organizations to leverage cutting-edge technologies and strategies for effective model operationalization and management at scale across various sectors.

North American ModelOps Market Market Size, and Share

Top Companies in ModelOps Market

The major modelOps Platform and service providers include IBM (US), Google (US), Oracle (US), SAS Institute (US), AWS (US), Teradata (US), Palantir (US), Veritone (US), Altair (US), c3.ai (US), TIBCO (US), Databricks (US), Giggso (US), Verta (US), ModelOp (US), Comet ML (US), Superwise (Israel), Evidently AI (US), Minitab (US), Seldon (UK), Innominds (US), Datatron (US), Domino Data Lab (US), Arthur (US), Weights & Biases (US), Xenonstack (US), Cnvrg.io (Israel), DataKitchen (US), Haisten AI(US), Sparkling Logic (US), LeewayHertz (US). These companies have used organic and inorganic growth strategies such as product launches, acquisitions, and partnerships to strengthen their position in the ModelOps Market.

Get online access to the report on the World's First Market Intelligence Cloud

  • Easy to Download Historical Data & Forecast Numbers
  • Company Analysis Dashboard for high growth potential opportunities
  • Research Analyst Access for customization & queries
  • Competitor Analysis with Interactive dashboard
  • Latest News, Updates & Trend analysis
Request Sample

Scope of the Report

Report Metrics

Details

Market size available for years

2019–2029

Base year considered

2023

Forecast period

2024–2029

Forecast units

USD Billion

Segments Covered

Offering, Model Type, Application, Vertical, and Region

Geographies covered

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America

List of Companies covered

IBM (US), Google (US), Oracle (US), SAS Institute (US), AWS (US), Teradata (US), Palantir (US), Veritone (US), Altair (US), c3.ai (US), TIBCO (US), Databricks (US), Giggso (US), Verta (US), ModelOp (US), Comet ML (US), Superwise (Israel), Evidently Al (US), Minitab (US), Seldon (UK), Innominds (US), Datatron (US), Domino Data Lab (US), Arthur (US), Weights & Biases (US), Xenonstack (US), Cnvrg.io (Israel), DataKitchen (US), Haisten AI (US), Sparkling Logic (US), LeewayHertz (US).

This research report categorizes the ModelOps Market based on Offering, Model Type, Application, Vertical, and Region.

Offering:
  • Platforms
    • By type
    • Development & Experimentation Platforms
    • Monitoring & Observability Tools
    • Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) Platforms
    • Performance Tracking & Management Platforms
    • Model Explainability & Interpretability Tools
    • Serving & Deployment Tools
    • Other types
  • By Deployment Mode
    • Cloud
    • On-Premises
  • Services
    • Consulting Services
    • Deployment & Integration
    • System & Maintenance
By Model Type:
  • ML Models
  • Graph-Based Models
  • Rule & Heuristic Models
  • Linguistic Models
  • Agent-Based Models
  • Bring Your Own Models
  • Other Model Types
By Application:
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment
  • Batch Scoring
  • Governance, Risk and Compliance
  • Parallelization & Distributed Computing
  • Monitoring & Alerting
  • Dashboard & Reporting
  • Model Lifecycle Management
  • Other Application
By Verticals:
  • BFSI
  • Retail & eCommerce
  • Healthcare & Life sciences
  • Telecommunications
  • IT/ITeS
  • Energy & Utilities  
  • Manufacturing
  • Transportation & Logistics
  • Government & Defense
  • Other Verticals
By Region:
  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
  • Europe
    • UK
    • France
    • Germany
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • ANZ
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • Egypt
    • South Africa
    • Rest of the Middle East & Africa
  • Latin America
    • Brazil
    • Mexico
    • Argentina
    • Rest of Latin America

Recent Developments:

  • In April 2024, IBM Updated Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data 4.8 with features enhancing integration with IBM Knowledge Catalog, improving tools like Data Refinery and JupyterLab IDE, and adding new capabilities such as federated learning and pipeline automation.
  • In April 2024, IBM acquired HashiCorp for USD 6.4 billion to enhance its hybrid cloud and AI capabilities. This acquisition integrated HashiCorp’s infrastructure automation tools, such as Terraform, into IBM’s portfolio, driving synergies with IBM’s Red Hat and watsonx offerings and expanding its modelOps capabilities. The deal aims to streamline lifecycle management across multi-cloud environments.
  • In March 2024, SAS and Microsoft partnered with Microsoft Azure to integrate SAS Viya, an analytics platform, enabling customers to leverage advanced AI and ML capabilities on the cloud. This partnership aims to streamline AI and ML model operations, empowering organizations to accelerate their journey toward deploying and managing analytics solutions effectively.
  • In November 2023, C3 AI expanded its collaboration with Amazon in artificial intelligence (AI). This partnership signifies a deepening integration of C3 AI's AI technologies with Amazon's cloud infrastructure, likely leading to enhanced AI capabilities and market opportunities for both companies.
  • In July 2022, TIBCO introduced a new ModelOps platform to streamline the deployment and management of machine learning models. The platform likely integrates automation and collaboration features to accelerate model delivery and improve operational efficiency for data science teams.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
1 INTRODUCTION 
    1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY 
    1.2 MARKET DEFINITION 
           1.2.1 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
    1.3 MARKET SCOPE 
           1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION
           1.3.2 REGIONS COVERED
           1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED FOR THE STUDY
    1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED 
    1.5 STAKEHOLDERS 
    1.6 IMPACT OF RECESSION 
 
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 
    2.1 RESEARCH DATA 
           2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
                    2.1.1.1 KEY DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
           2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
                    2.1.2.1 KEY DATA FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
                    2.1.2.2 KEY INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
                    2.1.2.3 BREAKDOWN OF PRIMARY INTERVIEWS
    2.2 MARKET BREAKUP AND DATA TRIANGULATION 
    2.3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION 
           2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
           2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
    2.4 MARKET FORECAST 
    2.5 ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STUDY 
    2.6 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 
    2.7 IMPLICATION OF RECESSION ON GLOBAL MODELOPS MARKET 
 
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS 
    4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMPANIES IN THE MODELOPS MARKET 
    4.2 MODELOPS MARKET:  BY OFFERING 
    4.3 MODELOPS MARKET:  BY MODEL TYPE 
    4.4 MODELOPS MARKET:  BY APPLICATION AND TOP THREE INDUSTRY VERTICAL 
    4.5 MODELOPS MARKET:  BY REGION 
 
5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS 
    5.1 INTRODUCTION 
    5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS 
           5.2.1 DRIVERS
           5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
           5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
           5.2.4 CHALLENGES
    5.3 INDUSTRY TRENDS 
           5.3.1 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
                    5.3.1.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
                               5.3.1.1.1 Artificial Intelligence (AI) 
                               5.3.1.1.2 Cloud Computing
                               5.3.1.1.3 Knowledge Graphs
                               5.3.1.1.4 No Code
                    5.3.1.2 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
                               5.3.1.2.1 Big Data & Analytics
                               5.3.1.2.2 Edge Computing
           5.3.2 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
           5.3.3 EVOLUTION OF MODELOPS MARKET 
           5.3.4 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
           5.3.5 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
                    5.3.5.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
                               5.3.5.1.1 North America
                               5.3.5.1.2 Europe
                               5.3.5.1.3 Asia Pacific
                               5.3.5.1.4 Middle East & Africa
                               5.3.5.1.5 Latin America
           5.3.6 VALUE/SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
           5.3.7 PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
                    5.3.7.1 THREAT FROM NEW ENTRANTS
                    5.3.7.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
                    5.3.7.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
                    5.3.7.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
                    5.3.7.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITION RIVALRY
           5.3.8 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS IN 2024-2025
           5.3.9 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
                    5.3.9.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
                    5.3.9.2 BUYING CRITERIA
           5.3.10 PRICING ANALYSIS
                    5.3.10.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY APPLICATION
                    5.3.10.2 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY OFFERING
           5.3.11 PATENT ANALYSIS
                    5.3.11.1 METHODOLOGY
                    5.3.11.2 PATENTS FILED, BY DOCUMENT TYPE
                    5.3.11.3 INNOVATION AND PATENT APPLICATIONS 
           5.3.12 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER’S BUSINESS
           5.3.13 MODELOPS VS MLOPS
           5.3.14 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO 
           5.3.15 STAGES OF MODELOPS 
           5.3.16 MODELOPS BEST PRACTICES
 
6 MODELOPS MARKET, BY OFFERING 
    6.1 INTRODUCTION 
           6.1.1 OFFERING: MODELOPS MARKET DRIVERS
    6.2 PLATFORMS 
           6.2.3 BY TYPE
                    6.2.3.1 DEVELOPMENT & EXPERIMENTATION PLATFORMS
                    6.2.3.2 MONITORING & OBSERVABILITY TOOLS
                    6.2.3.3 AUTOMATED MACHINE LEARNING (AUTOML) PLATFORMS
                    6.2.3.4 PERFORMANCE TRACKING & MANAGEMENT PLATFORMS
                    6.2.3.5 MODEL EXPLAINABILITY & INTERPRETABILITY TOOLS
                    6.2.3.6 SERVING & DEPLOYMENT TOOLS
                    6.2.3.7 OTHERS (CONTAINERIZATION, VERSION CONTROL SYSTEMS, MODEL GOVERNANCE & COMPLIANCE) 
           6.2.3 BY DEPLOYMENT MODE
                    6.2.3.1 CLOUD
                    6.2.3.2 ON-PREMISES
    6.3 SERVICES 
           6.3.1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 
                    6.3.1.1 CONSULTING SERVICES
                    6.3.1.2 DEPLOYMENT & INTEGRATION
                    6.3.1.3 SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE
 
7 MODELOPS MARKET, BY MODEL TYPE 
    7.1 INTRODUCTION 
           7.1.1 MODEL TYPE: MODELOPS MARKET DRIVERS
    7.2 ML MODELS 
    7.3 GRAPH BASED MODELS 
    7.4 RULE & HEURISTIC MODELS 
    7.5 LINGUISTIC MODELS 
    7.6 AGENT-BASED MODELS 
    7.7 BRING YOUR OWN MODELS 
    7.8 OTHER MODEL TYPES 
 
8 MODELOPS MARKET, BY APPLICATION 
    8.1 INTRODUCTION 
           8.1.1 APPLICATION: MODELOPS MARKET DRIVERS
    8.2 CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION/CONTINUOUS DEPLOYMENT 
    8.3 BATCH SCORING 
    8.4 GOVERNANCE, RISK AND COMPLIANCE  
    8.5 PARALLELIZATION & DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING 
    8.6 MONITORING & ALERTING 
    8.7 DASHBOARD & REPORTING 
    8.8 MODEL LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT 
    8.9 OTHERS (MODEL RISK MANAGEMENT, DATA & PIPELINE VERSIONING) 
 
9 MODELOPS MARKET, BY VERTICAL 
    9.1 INTRODUCTION 
           9.1.1 VERTICAL: MODELOPS MARKET DRIVERS
    9.2 BFSI  
           9.2.1 BFSI: USE CASES 
    9.3 RETAIL & ECOMMERCE  
           9.3.1 RETAIL & ECOMMERCE: USE CASES
    9.4 HEALTHCARE & LIFE SCIENCES  
           9.4.1 HEALTHCARE & LIFE SCIENCES: USE CASES
    9.5 TELECOMMUNICATIONS  
           9.5.1 TELECOMMUNICATIONS: USE CASES
    9.6 IT/ITES  
           9.6.1 IT/ITES: USE CASES
    9.7 ENERGY & UTILITIES  
           9.7.1 ENERGY & UTILITIES: USE CASES
    9.8 MANUFACTURING  
           9.8.1 MANUFACTURING: USE CASES
    9.9 TRANSPORATATION & LOGISTICS  
           9.9.1 TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS: USE CASES
    9.10 GOVERNMENT & DEFENSE  
           9.10.1 GOVERNMENT & DEFENSE: USE CASES
    9.11 OTHER VERTICALS (MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT, TRAVEL & HOSPITALITY, AND EDUCATION & RESEARCH) 
 
10 MODELOPS MARKET, BY REGION 
     10.1 INTRODUCTION 
     10.2 NORTH AMERICA 
             10.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             10.2.2 NORTH AMERICA: IMPACT OF RECESSION
             10.2.3 UNITED STATES
             10.2.4 CANADA
     10.3 EUROPE 
             10.3.1 EUROPE: MARKET DRIVERS
             10.3.2 EUROPE: IMPACT OF RECESSION
             10.3.3 UNITED KINGDOM
             10.3.4 FRANCE
             10.3.5 GERMANY
             10.3.6 ITALY
             10.3.7 SPAIN
             10.3.8 REST OF EUROPE
     10.4 ASIA PACIFIC 
             10.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: MARKET DRIVERS
             10.4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: IMPACT OF RECESSION
             10.4.3 CHINA
             10.4.4 JAPAN
             10.4.5 INDIA
             10.4.6 SOUTH KOREA
             10.3.7 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND
             10.4.8 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
     10.5 MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA 
             10.5.1 MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             10.5.2 MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA: IMPACT OF RECESSION
             10.5.3 KSA
             10.5.4 UAE
             10.5.5 QATAR
             10.5.6 EGYPT
             10.5.7 SOUTH AFRICA
             10.5.8 REST OF MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
     10.6 LATIN AMERICA 
             10.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             10.6.2 LATIN AMERICA: IMPACT OF RECESSION
             10.6.3 BRAZIL
             10.6.4 MEXICO
             10.6.5 ARGENTINA
             10.6.6 REST OF LATIN AMERICA
 
11 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 
     11.1 INTRODUCTION 
     11.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN 
             11.2.1 OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIES DEPLOYED BY KEY MODELOPS  VENDORS
     11.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS FOR KEY PLAYERS 
     11.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 
             11.4.1 MARKET RANKING ANALYSIS
     11.5 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 
     11.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023 
             11.6.1 STARS
             11.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
             11.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
             11.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
             11.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
                       11.6.5.1 Company Footprint
                       11.6.5.2 Region Footprint
                       11.6.5.3 Vertical Footprint
                       11.6.5.3 Application Footprint
                       11.6.5.5 Offering Footprint
     11.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023  
             11.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
             11.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
             11.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
             11.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
               11.7.5  COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023
                       11.7.5.1 Detailed List of Key Startups/SMEs
                       11.7.5.2 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Startups/ SMEs
     11.8 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS 
     11.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIOS AND TRENDS 
             11.9.1 NEW LAUNCHES
             11.9.2 DEALS
             11.9.3 OTHERS
 
12 COMPANY PROFILES 
     12.1 INTRODUCTION 
     12.2 KEY PLAYERS 
             12.2.1 IBM 
             12.2.2 GOOGLE
             12.2.3 SAS INSTITUTE
             12.2.4 AWS
             12.2.5 ORACLE
             12.2.6 TERADATA 
             12.2.7 VERITONE 
             12.2.8 ALTAIR
             12.2.9 C3 AI
             12.2.10 PALANTIR
             12.2.11 TIBCO SOFTWARE 
             12.2.12 DATABRICKS
             12.2.13 GIGGSO
             12.2.14 VERTA
             12.2.15 MODELOP
     12.3 OTHER PLAYERS 
             12.3.1 COMET ML
             12.3.2 SUPERWISE 
             12.3.3 EVIDENTLY 
             12.3.4 MINITAB 
             12.3.5 SELDON
             12.3.6 INNOMINDS
             12.3.7 DATATRON 
             12.3.8 DOMINO DATA LABS
             12.3.9 ARTHUR
             12.3.10 WEIGHTS & BIASES
             12.3.11 XENONSTACK 
             12.3.12 CNVRG.IO 
             12.3.13 DATAKITCHEN
             12.3.14 HAISTEN 
             12.3.15 SPARKLING LOGIC 
             12.3.16 LEEWAYHERTZ 
             12.3.17 KNIME 
 
13 ADJACENT MARKET 
     13.1 INTRODUCTION 
     13.2 MARKET DEFINITION 
     13.3 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MARKET 
     13.4 MLOPS MARKET 
 
14 APPENDIX 
     14.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE 
     14.2 KNOWLEDGE STORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL 
     14.3 AVAILABLE CUSTOMIZATIONS 
     14.4 RELATED REPORTS 
     14.5 AUTHOR DETAILS 

The research study for the ModelOps Market involved extensive secondary sources, directories, and several journals. Primary sources were mainly industry experts from the core and related industries, preferred modelOps platforms providers, third-party service providers, consulting service providers, end users, and other commercial enterprises. In-depth interviews with primary respondents, including key industry participants and subject matter experts, were conducted to obtain and verify critical qualitative and quantitative information and assess the market’s prospects.

Secondary Research

The market size of companies offering modelOps platforms and services was determined based on secondary data from paid and unpaid sources. It was also arrived at by analyzing the product portfolios of major companies and rating the companies based on their performance and quality.

In the secondary research process, various sources were referred to for identifying and collecting information for this study. Secondary sources included annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of companies; white papers, journals, and certified publications; and articles from recognized authors, directories, and databases. The data was also collected from other secondary sources, such as journals, government websites, blogs, and vendor websites. Additionally, modelOps spending of various countries was extracted from the respective sources. Secondary research was mainly used to obtain key information related to the industry’s value chain and supply chain to identify key players based on platforms, services, market classification, and segmentation according to offerings of major players, industry trends related to offering, data type, data processing, vertical, and region, and key developments from both market- and technology-oriented perspectives

Primary Research

In the primary research process, various primary sources from both the supply and demand sides were interviewed to obtain qualitative and quantitative information on the market. The primary sources from the supply side included various industry experts, including Chief Experience Officers (CXOs); Vice Presidents (VPs); directors from business development, marketing, and modelOps expertise; related key executives from modelOps platform vendors, System Integrators (SIs), professional service providers, and industry associations; and key opinion leaders.

Primary interviews were conducted to gather insights, such as market statistics, revenue data collected from platforms and services, market breakups, market size estimations, market forecasts, and data triangulation. Primary research also helped understand various trends related to technologies, applications, deployments, and regions. Stakeholders from the demand side, such as Chief Information Officers (CIOs), Chief Technology Officers (CTOs), Chief Strategy Officers (CSOs), and end users using modelOps, were interviewed to understand the buyer’s perspective on suppliers, products, service providers, and their current usage of modelOps platform and services which would impact the overall ModelOps Market.

The following is the breakup of primary profiles:

ModelOps Market Market Size, and Share

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

Multiple approaches were adopted for estimating and forecasting the ModelOps Market. The first approach estimates market size by summating companies’ revenue generated by selling platforms and services.

Market Size Estimation Methodology-Top-down approach

In the top-down approach, an exhaustive list of all the vendors offering platforms and services in the ModelOps Market was prepared. The revenue contribution of the market vendors was estimated through annual reports, press releases, funding, investor presentations, paid databases, and primary interviews. Each vendor’s offerings were evaluated based on the breadth of offering, data type, data processing, vertical, and region. The aggregate of all the companies’ revenue was extrapolated to reach the overall market size. Each subsegment was studied and analyzed for its global market size and regional penetration. The markets were triangulated through both primary and secondary research. The primary procedure included extensive interviews for key insights from industry leaders, such as CIOs, CEOs, VPs, directors, and marketing executives. The market numbers were further triangulated with the existing MarketsandMarkets repository for validation.

Market Size Estimation Methodology-Bottom-up approach

The bottom-up approach identified the adoption rate of modelOps offerings among different end users in key countries, with their regions contributing the most to the market share. For cross-validation, the adoption of the modelOps platform and services among industries, along with different use cases concerning their regions, was identified and extrapolated. Use cases identified in the different areas were given weightage for the market size calculation.

Based on the market numbers, the regional split was determined by primary and secondary sources. The procedure included the analysis of the ModelOps Market’s regional penetration. Based on secondary research, the regional spending on Information and Communications Technology (ICT), socio-economic analysis of each country, strategic vendor analysis of major modelOps platforms providers, and organic and inorganic business development activities of regional and global players were estimated. With the data triangulation procedure and data validation through primaries, the exact values of the overall ModelOps Market size and segments’ size were determined and confirmed using the study.

Top-down and Bottom-up approaches

ModelOps Market Market Top Down and Bottom Up Approach

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

Data Triangulation

The market was split into several segments and subsegments after arriving at the overall market size using the market size estimation processes as explained above. To complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact statistics of each market segment and subsegment, data triangulation and market breakup procedures were employed, wherever applicable. The overall market size was then used in the top-down procedure to estimate the size of other individual markets via percentage splits of the market segmentation.

Market Definition

According to SAS Institute, ModelOps refers to the systematic process through which analytical models are transferred from the data science team to the IT production team, ensuring a consistent cycle of deployment and updates. It is a crucial element in effectively leveraging AI models, yet only a few companies are currently utilizing this approach.

ModelOps (Model Operations) refers to the practices and tools used to streamline production deployment, monitoring, management, and governance of machine learning models. It focuses on ensuring models are reliable, scalable, and maintainable, bridging the gap between data science and IT operations to facilitate continuous delivery and integration of models.

Stakeholders

  • ModelOps Market Platform Providers
  • ModelOps Market Service Providers
  • End-user Industries
  • System Integrators (SIs)
  • Business Intelligence Solution Providers
  • Technology Providers
  • Value-added Resellers (VARs)
  • Government And Regulatory Bodies

Report Objectives

  • To define, describe, and predict the ModelOps Market by offering, model type, application, vertical, and region
  • To describe and forecast the ModelOps Market, in terms of value, by region—North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America
  • To provide detailed information regarding major factors influencing the market growth (drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges)
  • To strategically analyze micro markets with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the overall ModelOps Market
  • To profile key players and comprehensively analyze their market positions in terms of ranking and core competencies, along with detailing the competitive landscape for market leaders
  • To analyze competitive developments such as joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, product developments, and ongoing research and development (R&D) in the ModelOps Market
  • To provide the illustrative segmentation, analysis, and projection of the main regional markets

Available Customizations

With the given market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations per the company’s specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Product Analysis

  • The product matrix provides a detailed comparison of the product portfolio of each company.

Geographic Analysis as per Feasibility

  • Further breakup of the North American ModelOps Market
  • Further breakup of the European ModelOps Market
  • Further breakup of the Asia Pacific ModelOps Market
  • Further breakup of the Middle East & Africa ModelOps Market
  • Further breakup of the Latin America ModelOps Market

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five)
Custom Market Research Services

We will customize the research for you, in case the report listed above does not meet with your exact requirements. Our custom research will comprehensively cover the business information you require to help you arrive at strategic and profitable business decisions.

Request Customization
Report Code
TC 9051
Published ON
Jun, 2024
Choose License Type
BUY NOW
  • SHARE
X
Request Customization
Speak to Analyst
Speak to Analyst
OR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
PERSONALIZE THIS RESEARCH
  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
REQUEST A FREE CUSTOMIZATION
LET US HELP YOU!
  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the ModelOps Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
CUSTOMIZED WORKSHOP REQUEST
  • Call Us
  • +1-888-600-6441 (Corporate office hours)
  • +1-888-600-6441 (US/Can toll free)
  • +44-800-368-9399 (UK office hours)
CONNECT WITH US
ABOUT TRUST ONLINE
©2024 MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd. All rights reserved
DMCA.com Protection Status Website Feedback