Vendor Neutral Archive ( VNA ) & PACS Market

Vendor Neutral Archive ( VNA ) & PACS Market - VNA [On-premise Software, Hybrid & Cloud, Multi-Department & Multi-Site VNA] & Picture Archiving and Communication System [Enterprise, Cardiology & Radiology] - Global Forecast to 2018

Report Code: HIT 2128 Oct, 2013, by marketsandmarkets.com

Vendor neutral archive (VNA) and PACS are regarded as two important markets in the medical image management industry. VNAs enable the acquisition, management, and storage of images while streamlining the communication between multiple vendor PACS. The global Vendor neutral archive (VNA) market is poised to reach $335 million by 2018, at a healthy double-digit CAGR; whereas, the PACS market is growing at a steady CAGR of 5.8%, to reach $4.3 billion by 2018.

The Vendor neutral archive (VNA) market is segmented on the basis of its delivery mode, deployment model, and supplier type. In the delivery mode segment, on-premise VNA forms the largest segment of the overall Vendor neutral archive market, as on premise VNAs are perceived to offer better control and secure sharing of data. However, Hybrid VNA will be the fastest growing and consequently a new revenue generating segment for players in this market. Hybrid VNAs allow the cloud to store all the second copies of images, thereby significantly reducing the cost of disaster recovery.

Departmental PACS and enterprise PACS are the two major segments of the PACS market. PACS replacements govern the slow growing departmental PACS market, whereas enterprise PACS is a lucrative market, which is expected to grow at a CAGR 10.8% from 2013 to 2018.

Countries such as Australia, China, and Japan are witnessing nation-wide and state-wide healthcare reforms and changing healthcare IT policies. Owing to this, the Asia-Pacific VNA and PACS market represents significant growth opportunities.

A number of factors such as the presence of favorable government regulations for top markets and the growing demand for standard based storage, disaster recovery, and lifecycle management solutions are propelling the growth of the market for VNAs. Consolidation of patient information by integrating VNAs with electronic health records (EHR) is one of the important trends witnessed in this market. The major factors restricting the growth of this market are data breach incidences, misinterpretation of the VNA concept, and long VNA lifecycles that impact the buying decisions of users.

The consolidated Vendor neutral archive (VNA) market is marked by intense competition prevailing among PACS vendors, independent software vendors, and infrastructure vendors. These players adopt various strategies, predominantly partnerships, to enhance their market presence. Partnerships allow the introduction of best-of-breed solutions to the market, thereby satisfying the requirements of healthcare organizations for flexible and customized solutions.

Acuo Technologies (U.S.), a part of Perceptive Software, leads the global Vendor neutral archive (VNA) market with a market share of ~30%. Other key players in the VNA and PACS market include Agfa HealthCare (Belgium), BridgeHead Software (U.K.), Carestream Health (U.S.), Dell, Inc. (U.S.), GE Healthcare (U.K.), Fujifilm Corporation (Japan), Merge Health (U.S.), McKesson Corporation (U.S.), Philips Healthcare (The Netherlands), Siemens Healthcare (Germany), and TeraMedica (U.S.).

Vendor neutral archives are platforms aimed at empowering healthcare organizations to control, manage, store, and consolidate imaging data by streamlining the imaging workflow between PACS, EHRs (Electronic Health Records), and data centers. The global market is estimated to be valued at $165.3 million in 2013 and is expected to reach $335.4 million by 2018, at a healthy CAGR of 15.2%.

Along with the global market for VNA, the PACS market is also given to provide a comparative analysis of both the healthcare information systems. The product lifecycles of each of these systems varies to a very large extent. It is believed that the vendor neutral archives (VNA) market is positioned in a phase (exponential phase) where the PACS market was around 10 to 15 years ago. The PACS market, on the other hand, is a mature market that is typically characterized by the market players trying to invest in product differentiations and looking for new customer groups.

Based on the delivery mode, the market is categorized into on-premise VNAs, hybrid VNAs, and fully cloud-hosted VNAs. On-premise VNAs dominate the current market in terms of total revenue contribution due to the high preference of this mode over others. This preference is as a result of better data control and high security provided by on-premise VNA solutions. However, owing to the large capital expenditure involved for on-premise VNAs, hybrid VNA solutions that involve a cloud-based component for storage are now capturing the attention of small and medium-sized healthcare providers. Thus, hybrid VNA solutions are slated to grow at a faster rate when compared to on-premise solutions, growing at a CAGR of 18.7% to reach $51.3 million by 2018.

The advantages of vendor neutral archives over  PACS in terms of interoperability, flexibility, and accessibility are propelling the adoption of the VNA technology in the market. Apart from this, favorable and promising government reforms in the healthcare information technology field are also stimulating the market. The major hindrances to the growth of the market are rising incidences of data breaches, complexity of the VNA concept, lack of a proper industry-accepted definition of VNAs, and long VNA lifecycles (that impacts VNA deployment decisions). With this, the market is all set to witness trends such as integration of VNAs with EHRs, employment of cloud computing solutions for VNA products, and a holistic approach for delivering enhanced patient care.

North America is the largest contributor to this market and is valued at $140.3 million in 2013. Through acts such as HITECH (Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability) and ACA (Affordable Care), the U.S. market is expected to witness growing adoptions of EHRs and VNAs and hospital consolidations. The European market is poised to grow at a high double-digit CAGR of 16.6%, with the biggest market being U.K. owing to the presence of huge NHS trusts that purchase VNAs on a very large scale. Australia, China, and Japan are the next promising regions for embracement of this technology due to the government-supported nation-wide healthcare reforms taking place in these regions.

Key companies in VNA & PACS market include Acuo Technologies (U.S.), Agfa HealthCare (Belgium), BridgeHead Software (U.K.), Carestream Health (U.S.), Dell, Inc. (U.S.), GE Healthcare (U.K.), Fujifilm Corporation (Japan), Merge Health (U.S.), McKesson Corporation (U.S.), Philips Healthcare (The Netherlands), Siemens Healthcare (Germany), and TeraMedica (U.S.).

Table Of Contents
 
1 Introduction (Page No. - 18)
  1.1 Key Take-Aways
  1.2 Report Description
  1.3 Markets Covered
  1.4 Stakeholders
  1.5 Market Scope
  1.6 Research Methodology
      1.6.1 Market Size Estimation
      1.6.2 Market Crackdown & Data Triangulation
      1.6.3 Market Share
      1.6.4 Key Data Points From Secondary Sources
      1.6.5 Key Data Points From Primary Sources
      1.6.6 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary (Page No. - 30)

3 Market Overview (Page No. - 33)
  3.1 Introduction
  3.2 Market Dynamics
      3.2.1 Drivers
            3.2.1.1 Increasing Demand For Standard-Based Medical Image Archiving And Non-Dicom Content Management Fuels VNA Deployments
            3.2.1.2 VNAS Overcome PACS Technological Limitations; Act As A Major Market Propellant
            3.2.1.3 Healthcare It-Specific Government Regulations And Guidelines Positively Impact The Adoption Of VNAS
            3.2.1.4 Reduction Of Data Migration Costs, A Crucial Benefit Of A VNA, Encourages Investments In The Technology
            3.2.1.5 Need For Effective Disaster Recovery And Lifecycle Management Strategies Boosts The Market
      3.2.2 Restraints
            3.2.2.1 Rising Incidences Of Data Breaches Compromise Privacy And Security Of Imaging Data
            3.2.2.2 Longer VNA Lifecycles Impact The Adoption Decisions Of Providers
            3.2.2.3 Unclear Definition Of A True VNA Results In Confusion Among Providers
      3.2.3 Opportunities
            3.2.3.1 Increasing Interest From Emerging Markets Promotes VNA Technology In These Regions
            3.2.3.2 Cloud-Based Solutions Represent High-Growth Opportunities
            3.2.3.3 Patient-Centric Approach To Deliver Enhanced Care To Open New Avenues For Development Of VNAS
      3.2.4 Winning Imperative
            3.2.4.1 Best-Of-Breed Solutions Through Partnerships
      3.2.5 Burning Issues
            3.2.5.1 Evolving Interoperability Standards Present Considerable Challenges
            3.2.5.2 Integration Of VNAS With EHRS And ECMS Appears Futuristic

4 Industry Analysis (Page No. - 47)
  4.1 Vendor Neutral Archives Ecosystem
      4.1.1 Imaging Modalities
      4.1.2 PACS
      4.1.3 Vendor Neutral Archives Software
      4.1.4 Primary Subsystem (Primary Data Center)
      4.1.5 Secondary Subsystem (Secondary Data Center)
  4.2 Porters Five Forces Analysis
      4.2.1 Threat From New Entrants
      4.2.2 Threat From Substitutes
      4.2.3 Competitors Rivalry
      4.2.4 Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
      4.2.5 Bargaining Power Of Buyers
  4.3 Product Lifecycle
      4.3.1 Introduction
      4.3.2 PACS VS. VNA Product Lifecycle
  4.4 Market Chasm Analysis

5 Global Picture Archiving And Communication System Market (Page No. - 56)
  5.1 Introduction
  5.2 Departmental PACS
  5.3 Enterprise PACS

6 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market (Page No. - 69)
  6.1 Introduction
  6.2 Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Delivery Mode
      6.2.1 On-Premise (On-Site) VNA
      6.2.2 Hybrid VNA
      6.2.3 Fully Cloud-Hosted VNA
  6.3 VNA Market, By Procurement Model
      6.3.1 Departmental VNA
      6.3.2 Multi-Departmental VNA
      6.3.3 Multi-Site VNA
  6.4 VNA Market, By Player Type
      6.4.1 PACS Vendors
      6.4.2 Independent Software Vendors
      6.4.3 Infrastructure Vendors

7 Geographic Analysis (Page No. - 94)
  7.1 Introduction
  7.2 Pest Analysis
      7.2.1 Political Factors
      7.2.2 Economical Factors
      7.2.3 Social Factors
      7.2.4 Technological Factors
  7.3 North America
  7.4 Europe
  7.5 Asia-Pacific
  7.6 ROW

8 Competitive Landscape (Page No. - 120)
  8.1 Competitive Situation & Trends
      8.1.1 Introduction
      8.1.2 New Product Launches
      8.1.3 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations & Joint Ventures
      8.1.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
      8.1.5 Other Developments
  8.2 Market Share Analysis

9 Company Profiles (Overview, Financials, Products & Services, Strategy, & Developments)* (Page No. - 142)
  9.1 ACUO Technologies (Perceptive Software)
  9.2 AGFA Healthcare
  9.3 Bridgehead Software
  9.4 Carestream Health, Inc.
  9.5 Dejarnette Research Systems, Inc.
  9.6 Dell, Inc.
  9.7 Fujifilm Corporation
  9.8 GE Healthcare
  9.9 Mach 7 Technologies
  9.10 Mckesson Corporation
  9.11 Merge Healthcare
  9.12 Novarad Corporation
  9.13 Philips Healthcare
  9.14 Siemens Healthcare
  9.15 Teramedica
 
*Details On Financials, Product & Services, Strategy, & Developments Might Not Be Captured In Case Of Unlisted Companies.
 
List Of Tables (54 Tables)
 
Table 1 Global Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 2 Global PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 3 PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 4 Global Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 5 Departmental PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 6 Radiology PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 7 Cardiology PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 8 Other Departmental PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 9 Enterprise PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 10 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 11 Global Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 12 Global Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 13 Global  Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 14 Global Market, By Delivery Mode, By Geography, 2013 ($Million) 75
Table 15 Global Market, By Procurement Model, By Geography, 2013 ($Million)
Table 16 Global Market, By Player Type, By Geography, 2013 ($Million)
Table 17 On-Premise Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 18 Hybrid Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 19 Fully Cloud-Hosted Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 20 Departmental Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 21 Multi-Departmental Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 22 Multi-Site Vendor Neutral Archive, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 23 PACS Vendors Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 24 Independent Software Vendors (ISV) Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 25 Infrastructure Vendors, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 26 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 27 North America: Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 28 North America: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 29 North America: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 30 North America: Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 31 North America: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($ Million)
Table 32 North America: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 33 Europe: Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 34 Europe: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 35 Europe: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 36 Europe: Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 37 Europe:  Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 38 Europe Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 39 Asia-Pacific: Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 40 Asia-Pacific: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 41 Asia-Pacific: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 42 Asia-Pacific: Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 43 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 44 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 45 ROW: Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 46 ROW: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 47 ROW: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 48 ROW: Vendor Neutral Archive Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 49 ROW: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 50 ROW: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 51 New Product Launches, 2010 – 2013
Table 52 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations & Joint Ventures, 2009 – 2013
Table 53 Mergers & Acquisitions, 2010 – 2013
Table 54 Other Developments, 2010 – 2013
 
List Of Figures (48 Figures)
 
Figure 1 Vendor Neutral Archives Market: Research Methodology
Figure 2 Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market Size Estimation Methodology – 1/2
Figure 3 Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market Size Estimation Methodology – 2/2
Figure 4 Vendor Neutral Archive & PACS Market: Data Triangulation Methodology
Figure 5 Market Dynamics
Figure 6 Market Dynamics – Impact Analysis
Figure 7 Vendor Neutral Archives Ecosystem
Figure 8 Vendor Neutral Archives Market: Porters Five Forces Analysis
Figure 9 PACS VS. Vendor Neutral Archive: Product Lifecycle
Figure 10 Vendor Neutral Archives: Market Chasm Analysis
Figure 11 Multi-Departmental Vendor Neutral Archive
Figure 12 Multi-Site Vendor Neutral Archive
Figure 13 Key Growth Strategies, 2010 – 2013
Figure 14 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market Share Analysis, By Key Players, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 15 Imaging Studies Volume, By Key Players, 2012 (Million)
Figure 16 Lexmark International: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 17 Lexmark International: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010- 2012 ($Million)
Figure 18 ACUO Technologies: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 19 ACUO Technologies: SWOT Analysis
Figure 20 AGFA Healthcare: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 21 AGFA Healthcare: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 22 AGFA Healthcare: Market Startegy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 23 SWOT Analysis: AGFA Healthcare
Figure 24 Bridgehead Software: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 25 Carestream Health, Inc.: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 26 Onex Corporation: Healthcare Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 27 Carestream Health: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 28 SWOT Analysis: Dejarnette Research Systems
Figure 29 Dell, Inc. (Public Segment): Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 30 Dell, Inc.: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Billion)
Figure 31 Dell, Inc.: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 32 SWOT Analysis: Dell, Inc.
Figure 33 Fujifilm Information Solutions Business Segment: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2011 – 2013
Figure 34 GE Electric Company: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 35 GE Electric Company: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Billion)
Figure 36 GE Healthcare: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 37 GE Healthcare: SWOT Anaylsis
Figure 38 Mckesson Corporation: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2011 – 2013
Figure 39 Mckesson Corporation Technology Solution Segment: Total Revenue, By Sub-Segment, 2013 ($Million) Figure 40 Merge Healthcare, Inc.: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 41 Merge Healthcare, Inc.: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2012
Figure 42 Philips: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 43 Philips Healthcare: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 44 Philips Healthcare: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 45 Siemens Healthcare: Total Revenue And R&D Expenditure, 2010 – 2012
Figure 46 Siemens Ag: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 47 Teramedica: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 48 SWOT Analysis : Teramedica


Request for detailed methodology, assumptions & how numbers were triangulated.

Please share your problem/objectives in greater details so that our analyst can verify if they can solve your problem(s).
8 4 8 4 5  
  • Select all
  • News-Letters with latest Market insights
  • Information & discussion on the relevant new products and services
  • Information & discussion on Market insights and Market information
  • Information & discussion on our events and conferences
    • Select all
    • Email Phone Professional and social network (Linkedin, etc)
Custom Market Research Services

We will customize the research for you, in case the report listed above does not meet with your exact requirements. Our custom research will comprehensively cover the business information you require to help you arrive at strategic and profitable business decisions.

Request Customization

Instant Answers with GPT - Ask Now!

Ask real questions. Get complete answers !
Report Code
HIT 2128
Published ON
Oct, 2013
Choose License Type
BUY NOW
  • SHARE
X
Request Customization
Speak to Analyst
Speak to Analyst
OR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
PERSONALIZE THIS RESEARCH
  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
REQUEST A FREE CUSTOMIZATION
LET US HELP YOU!
  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the Vendor Neutral Archive ( VNA ) & PACS Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
CUSTOMIZED WORKSHOP REQUEST
+1-888-600-6441
  • Call Us
  • +1-888-600-6441 (Corporate office hours)
  • +1-888-600-6441 (US/Can toll free)
  • +44-800-368-9399 (UK office hours)
CONNECT WITH US
ABOUT TRUST ONLINE
©2024 MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd. All rights reserved
DMCA.com Protection Status Website Feedback