Zero Trust Security Market

Zero Trust Security Market Size Share, Growth Analysis, By Offering (Solutions and Services), Application, Security type, Authentication Type, Vertical (Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare, Energy & Utilities) and Region - Global Industry Forecast to 2029

Report Code: TC 7384 Jul, 2024, by marketsandmarkets.com

[330 Pages Report] The global Zero Trust Security Market is projected to grow from USD 36.5 billion in 2024 to USD 78.7 billion by 2029 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.6% during the forecast period. The zero trust security market is showing promising growth due to the rising threat of cyberattacks.

The zero trust security market is growing fast as cyber threats get more complex and companies move to remote work and cloud systems. Zero trust security’s main idea is never to trust; always check. That means every user and device must prove who they are before they can access anything, no matter where they are from. This approach has fallen in sight because of several reasons: more cyberattacks, more use of cloud tech, more people working from home, and stricter rules about data privacy. They primarily focus on combining zero trust with Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) and using AI and machine learning to boost security. Since hackers are coming up with new tricks, zero trust is becoming a must-have for companies to guard their sensitive info and systems in this digital world.

Zero Trust Security Market

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

Zero Trust Security Market Opportunities

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

IMPACT OF AI/GEN AI ON ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET

Generative AI is causing a revolution in zero trust security providing several main benefits. It improves threat detection by examining huge data sets to identify anomalies, possible threats, and conventional approaches. Systems powered by AI can also automate responses to threats, which cuts down on human mistakes and response time. AI evaluates risk profiles to optimize security measures and resource distribution. It speeds up incident response by automating tasks and giving useful insights to security teams. Along with the advantages, AI also creates new attack possibilities, such as AI-created phishing attacks or adversarial AI. Generative AI shows great potential to boost zero trust security by enhancing threat detection, response, and risk assessment, although it requires careful thought about the possible risks and the creation of strong defenses against AI-based threats. As AI technology expands, it becomes essential for businesses to stay alert and flexible in their security plans.

Top Companies in Zero Trust Security Market Impact

ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DYNAMICS

Driver: Rapid adoption of cloud and surge in digital transformation.

Organizations need advanced security for protection in complex IT environments; therefore, zero trust security becomes very important in protecting relevant data and avoiding losses. Traditional perimeter-based security no longer works in the wake of such aspects as remote work, mobile devices, and cloud computing that give blanket access once into the network. Zero trust security enforces strict access control and continuous authentication at all times so that users' access is thus verified and limited. It avoids the lateral movement of threats and offers better protection of critical data; therefore, its rise as a robust alternative has been witnessed. This means every request, whether user, device, or application request, must be continuously authenticated and allowed within the internal network. It reduces the chance of unauthorized access and the lateral movement of threats by making sure that only authenticated entities have access to important resources and data. As digital transformation and cloud adoption, together, result in enterprises facing a really complicated, networked IT environment for securing data and apps, establishing a strong, very advanced security solution to protect critical data and prevent losses becomes mandatory. As far as this respect is concerned, cloud computing and development in digital transformation have accelerated the demand for zero trust security solutions that reduce unauthorized threats and ensure access of key resources to only authorized persons. The increasing adoption of cloud environments and the current digital transformation act as drivers in the zero-trust security market. The "digital transformation"—that is, the process of integrating digital technologies into all facets of business operations—begets a much more complex and networked IT environment. This in effect means that businesses are rapidly deploying many devices, cloud-based applications, and networked systems that increase the attack surface for cyberattacks. The increased leverage of multi-cloud settings underscores a security plan designed to protect apps and their data across a number of cloud platforms. In that respect, zero trust security is implemented more successfully in businesses. Zero trust security follows the adage, "never trust, always verify".

Restraint: Complexity and costly implementation

The implementation of zero-trust security for any business, particularly for those with expansive and complicated network infrastructures, which can be quite a difficult and expensive procedure. Since it is complex and hard to understand and implement, it can contain potential mistakes in its implementation that may further endanger the security of the organization. It is also an expensive security approach that shall require the installation of new equipment and software and training of IT personnel. This may put certain organizations under a considerable financial burden. Moreover, this approach requires considerable changes in existing IT policies, procedures, and systems, which itself is a time- as well as a resource-consuming process. Furthermore, the upfront cost and continuous maintenance make some firms reluctant to adapt zero trust security solution at all. For instance, imposing zero-trust security creates problems in a multi-national organization with an extensive network architecture. The network is across multiple sites; underpinning it are a number of legacy systems that are very hard to integrate with modern zero-trust solutions. The cost in terms of redesigning the whole network and integration with legacy systems to include zero-trust security has resulted in the adoption process grinding to a halt.

Opportunity: Surge in awareness regarding zero trust security

The growing awareness regarding zero-trust security is creating huge opportunities for businesses in the cybersecurity sector. The zero-trust security designs its way to become the viable replacement for traditional methods under increasing cyber threats in terms of frequency and inadequacy. More education in this regard means a more potent market for the zero-trust security solution, ultimately leading to growing demands for related goods and services. It builds a very promising market for zero-trust security because now, organizations seek and look to invest in zero-trust security to further beef up the cybersecurity posture.

This increased level of awareness has precipitated openings for a good number of support services within the zero-trust security space. Cybersecurity consulting businesses will make hay by offering expert advice on how to correctly install and integrate such solutions for businesses that would like to do so successfully. As corporations crave to have their staff well-versed with the best practices and principles of zero-trust security, there is a corresponding surge in demand for educative material and training courses. The companies are also eying joint ventures and collaborations with other firms, including cloud service providers, toward the building of a uniform and all-inclusive security ecosystem. Hence, businesses are tactically positioning themselves to provide for these companies' changing security needs and benefit from increased demand for reliable and flexible security solutions as the awareness provided by these changing needs expands.

Challenges: Growth of shadow SaaS applications

Business-led IT or Shadow SaaS is what it is called when employees obtain and implement IT services without any sort of notification or approval from the IT Department. It is becoming more common for this phenomenon to happen today. Cloud storage and SaaS apps can be examples among many other IT services. The most important benefits of business-led IT are simplicity and speed of access to apps. Implementation into a zero-trust security framework itself, in the best-case scenario, will take weeks or months, killing the benefits brought about by efficiency and corporate agility. Employees

This can often mean that productivity-enhancing SaaS applications get bought directly by the would-be productive, bypassing the formal procurement process and the IT department—a challenge for zero-trust security. This thus implies that these rogue applications are a security threat since they are beyond the institution's security policy control and may uphold different security standards as other apps. An example is that shadow Saas applications may not be encrypted, patched rarely, or audited for vulnerabilities; they hence expose themselves to far greater degrees of cyber-attacks as a result.

Zero Trust Security Market Ecosystem

Top Companies in Zero Trust Security Market

By vertical, the IT&ITeS segment is to account for a larger market size during the forecast period.

This can be attributed to the massive growth that the information technology and IT-enabled services industries have been registering in North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific, hence becoming a most preferred target with its rapid growth and volume of sensitive employee and company data. Besides, cloud computing, IoT devices, and BYOD rules only add to the proliferation in the attack surface, which has grown multi-fold. The very critical communication infrastructure remains in the hands of telecom operators, who themselves become a target for sophisticated attacks, including ransomware and DDoS attacks, with an aim to put at risk sensitive data. The two major factors driving this trend are Z regulations and the sophistication of modern-day cyber-attacks. Zero Trust security solutions are protecting the world's infrastructure; it is one of the tools available for IT companies and IT service providers to effectively wage back in the face of growing cyber threats.

By Security Type, the Cloud Security segment is to account for a larger market size during the forecast period

Zero-trust security concepts are of growing importance in a fast-changing cybersecurity environment, particularly in the context of the cloud. Distributed apps and data in the adoption of cloud computing present a problem to organizations wishing to monitor access, usage of data, and security policy compliance. A variety of cloud security solutions have been developed following the paradigm of Zero Trust to help solve these issues. CASBs are mediators that provide close access control and constant monitoring of user activities in cloud applications. The proper and continuous assessment and hardening of cloud configurations are important means through which CSPM tools contribute to the reduction of vulnerabilities and the assurance of good security postures. CWPPs implement a model of workload protection for cloud-native applications that's based on "never trust, always verify.".

By Authentication Type, the Multi-factor Authentication to grow at a higher CAGR during the forecast period

Multi-factor authentication basically combines a few identifiers from people and from computers or software to verify one's identification. These can include passwords or PINs, passports, tokens, access cards, software certificates, biometric data, fingerprints, face recognition, and so on that constitute these identifiers. The development of multi-factor authentication has been the real backbone in identity verification and authentication. Some of the most popular MFA identifiers in use today are user passwords/PINs, cryptographic hardware security tokens, smartcards, software-based certificates, and a large group of techniques using biometric factors like retinal scans, fingerprint scans, facial recognition, and voice recognition. MFA forms a base component of the zero-trust security model since it creates a high-valued barrier to entry that will keep unauthorized users out of the system in case an attacker has managed to compromise one component. Since successful verification normally happens in a single session, MFA can effectively block attacks like persistence and lateral movement.

According to the PCI DSS rules, MFA solutions are a must for companies processing sensitive data, more so those within the sphere of payments. One major driving force behind the wide adoption of MFA across industries such as BFSI, government & defense, IT and telecom, healthcare, retail & eCommerce, energy & power, and manufacturing is the growing demand for robust identification and authentication techniques to protect sensitive information. Key players in zero-trust security develop highly advanced multi-factor authentication solutions by integrating state-of-the-art technologies, such as vein detection, thermal image identification, hand geometry, etc., which, in turn, would raise the market's further growth globally.

By region, North America will have the largest market size during the forecast period.

Zero Trust Security Market  Size, and Share

The North American market, including the US and Canada, is characterized by a high concentration of security vendors and a rise in cyberattacks. This sector may maintain a leading position in the zero trust security market for some time to come because of its early adoption of cutting-edge technologies. The increase in sophisticated cyberattacks is one of the key factors driving businesses to implement zero trust security solutions. The increasing usage of IoT, digital payments, cloud-based apps, and OT, as well as industries including banking, finance, government, and healthcare, the region is now more susceptible to cyberattacks. This was demonstrated in the January MailChimp attack, where hackers gained unauthorized access and affected a significant number of users by using social engineering techniques. These kinds of incidents emphasize how important it is to have a zero-trust policy, which may effectively stop escalations and restrict lateral movement within networks.

Key Market Players

Palo Alto Networks (US), VMware (US), Zscaler (US), Akamai (US), Microsoft (US), Cisco (US), IBM (US), Qnext (US), Citrix (US), Check Point (Isreal), Trellix (US), Forcepoint (US), CrowdStrike (US), Cloudflare (US), Fortinet (US), and Google (US) are some of the key players operating in the global Zero Trust Security market.

Want to explore hidden markets that can drive new revenue in Zero Trust Security Market?

Scope of the Report

Report Metrics

Details

Market size available for years

2018–2029

Base year considered

2023

Forecast period

2024–2029

Forecast units

Value (USD Million/USD Billion)

Segments Covered

  • By Offering, Application, Security Type, Authentication Type, and Vertical.

Geographies covered

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East Africa, and Latin America.

Major Companies covered

Major vendors in the global Zero Trust Security market include Palo Alto Networks (US), VMware (US), Zscaler (US), Akamai (US), Microsoft (US), Cisco (US), IBM (US), Qnext (US), Citrix (US), Check Point (Isreal), Trellix (US), Forcepoint (US), CrowdStrike (US), Cloudflare (US), Fortinet (US), and Google (US).

The study categorizes the Zero Trust Security market by offering, application, security type, authentication type, vertical, and region.

By Offering
  • Solutions
  • Services
By Application
  • Access Control/ Data Access Control
  • API Security
  • User Behaviour Analytics (UBA)
  • Security Analytics
  • Other Applications
By Security Type
  • Network security
  • Application Security
  • Cloud Security
  • Data security
  • Endpoint security and IoT security
By Authentication Type
  • Single-Factor Authentication
  • Multi-Factor Authentication
Vertical
  • Banking, Financial Services, And Insurance (BFSI)
  • Government And Defense
  • IT & ITES
  • Healthcare
  • Retail And E-commerce
  • Energy And Utilities
  • Other Verticals
Region
  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Latin America

Recent Development

  • In May 2024, Palo Alto Networks launched Prisma 3.0. Prisma SASE 3.0 extends Zero Trust to unmanaged devices, secures data with AI, and boosts application performance for partners and customers. Prisma SASE continues to deliver industry-leading SLAs for security processing and app performance. Prisma SASE 3.0 and its updated capabilities will be generally available in the coming months.
  • In May 2024, Palo Alto Networks launched a host of new security solutions to help enterprises thwart AI-generated attacks and effectively secure AI-by-design. Leveraging Precision AI, the new proprietary innovation that combines the best of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) with the accessibility of Generative AI (GenAI) for real-time.
  • In October 2021, VMware announced a range of security innovations, including zero trust architecture, ransomware protection, API security, and distributed workforce solutions, providing comprehensive and effective security for modern enterprises.
  • In January 2024, Zscaler Zero Trust SASE, is a single-vendor SASE solution. The new platform is expected to use Zscaler Zero Trust AI to help organisations reduce cost and complexity while implementing Zero Trust security across users, devices, and workloads.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ):

To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst

Exclusive indicates content/data unique to MarketsandMarkets and not available with any competitors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
1 INTRODUCTION 
    1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES 
    1.2 MARKET DEFINITION 
    1.3 STUDY SCOPE 
           1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION
           1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
           1.3.3 REGIONS COVERED
           1.3.4 YEARS CONSIDERED 
    1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED 
    1.5 STAKEHOLDERS 
    1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES 
 
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 
    2.1 RESEARCH DATA 
           2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
           2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
                    2.1.2.1 Breakup of primary profiles
                    2.1.2.2 Key industry insights
    2.2 MARKET BREAKUP AND DATA TRIANGULATION 
    2.3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION 
    2.4 MARKET FORECAST 
    2.5 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS 
    2.6 LIMITATIONS   
 
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS 
    4.1 BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET 
    4.2 MARKET, BY OFFERING, 2024–2029 
    4.3 MARKET, BY SECURITY TYPE, 2024–2029 
    4.4 MARKET, BY AUTHENTICATION TYPE, 2024–2029 
    4.5 MARKET, BY APPLICATION, 2024–2029 
    4.6 MARKET, BY VERTICAL, 2024–2029 
    4.7 MARKET INVESTMENT SCENARIO, BY REGION 
 
5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS 
    5.1 INTRODUCTION 
    5.2 EVOLUTION OF ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET  
    5.3 MARKET DYNAMICS 
           5.3.1 DRIVERS
           5.3.2 RESTRAINTS
           5.3.3 OPPORTUNITIES
           5.3.4 CHALLENGES
    5.4 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS 
           5.4.1 CASE STUDY 1
           5.4.2 CASE STUDY 2
           5.4.3 CASE STUDY 3
    5.5 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS 
    5.6 ECOSYSTEM/MARKET MAP 
    5.7 PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS 
    5.8 PRICING ANALYSIS  
           5.8.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY OFFERING
           5.8.2 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY SERVICES
    5.9 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 
           5.9.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
                    5.9.1.1  MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION (MFA)
                    5.9.1.2 IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IAM)
           5.9.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGY
                    5.9.2.1 ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA)
                    5.9.2.2 IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IAM)
           5.9.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGY
                    5.9.3.1 SECURE ACCESS SERVICE EDGE (SASE)
    5.1 IMPACT OF GEN AI ON THE ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET 
    5.11 PATENT ANALYSIS 
    5.12 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER’S BUSINESS 
    5.13 TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP 
    5.14 BEST PRACTICES IN THE ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET 
    5.15 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE 
           5.15.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
           5.15.2 REGULATIONS, BY REGION
    5.16 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA 
           5.16.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
           5.16.2 BUYING CRITERIA
    5.17 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS IN 2024-25 
    5.18 BUSINESS MODEL ANALYSIS 
    5.19 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO 
 
6 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY OFFERING 
    6.1 INTRODUCTION 
           6.1.1 OFFERING: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
    6.2 SOLUTION  
           6.2.1 IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IAM) 
           6.2.2 MICRO SEGMENTATION
           6.2.3 ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA) 
           6.2.4 ZERO TRUST DATA ACCESS (ZTDA) 
           6.2.5 SECURITY INFORMATION AND EVENT MANAGEMENT (SIEM)
           6.2.6 USER AND ENTITY BEHAVIOR  ANALYTICS (UEBA)
           6.2.7 POLICY MANAGEMENT 
           6.2.8 OTHER SOLUTION TYPES (DATA ENCRYPTION, MDM, DECEPTION TECHNOLOGY)
    6.3 SERVICES 
           6.3.1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 
                    6.3.1.1 DESIGN, DEPLOYMENT, INTEGRATION, AND CONSULTING
                    6.3.1.2 TRAINING, AND EDUCATION
                    6.3.1.3 SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE
           6.3.2 MANAGED SERVICES
 
7 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY APPLICATION  
    7.1 INTRODUCTION 
           7.1.1 APPLICATION: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
    7.2 ACCESS CONTROL (INCLUSIVE OF DATA ACCESS CONTROL) 
    7.3 API SECURITY 
    7.4 USER BEHAVIOUR ANALYTICS (UBA)  
    7.5 SECURITY ANALYTICS 
    7.6 OTHER APPLICATIONS 
 
8 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY SECURITY TYPE 
    8.1 INTRODUCTION 
           8.1.1 SECURITY TYPE: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
    8.2 NETWORK SECURITY 
    8.3 APPLICATION SECURITY 
    8.4 CLOUD SECURITY  
    8.5 DATA SECURITY  
    8.6 ENDPOINT SECURITY AND IOT SECURITY 
 
9 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY AUTHENTICATON TYPE 
    9.1 INTRODUCTION 
           9.1.1 AUTHENTICATON TYPE: MARKET DRIVERS
    9.2 SINGLE-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION  
    9.3 MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION  
 
10 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY VERTICAL 
     10.1 INTRODUCTION 
             10.1.1 VERTICAL: MARKET DRIVERS
     10.2 BANKING, FINANCIAL SERVICES, AND INSURANCE (BFSI) 
     10.3 GOVERNMENT AND DEFENSE  
     10.4 IT & ITES 
     10.5 HEALTHCARE  
     10.6 RETAIL AND ECOMMERCE 
     10.7 ENERGY AND UTILITIES 
     10.8 OTHER VERTICALS (TELECOM, MANUFACTURING, TRAVEL AND HOSPITALITY, TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS, AND EDUCATION)  
 
11 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY REGION 
     11.1 INTRODUCTION 
     11.2 NORTH AMERICA 
             11.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             11.2.2 NORTH AMERICA: RECESSION IMPACT
             11.2.3 NORTH AMERICA: REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
             11.2.4 UNITED STATES (US)
             11.2.5 CANADA
     11.3 EUROPE 
             11.3.1 EUROPE: MARKET DRIVERS
             11.3.2 EUROPE: RECESSION IMPACT
             11.3.3 EUROPE: REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
             11.3.4 UNITED KINGDOM (UK)
             11.3.5 GERMANY
             11.3.6 FRANCE 
             11.3.7 ITALY
             11.3.8 REST OF EUROPE 
     11.4 ASIA PACIFIC 
             11.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: MARKET DRIVERS
             11.4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: RECESSION IMPACT
             11.4.3 ASIA PACIFIC: REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
             11.4.4 CHINA
             11.4.5 JAPAN
             11.4.6 INDIA
             11.4.7 SINGAPORE
             11.4.8 AUSTRALIA
             11.4.9 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
     11.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 
             11.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             11.5.2 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: RECESSION IMPACT
             11.5.3 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
             11.5.4 GCC COUNTRIES
                       11.5.4.1 KSA
                       11.5.4.2 UAE
                       11.5.4.3 REST OF GCC COUNTRIES 
             11.5.5 SOUTH AFRICA 
             11.5.6 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA  
     11.6 LATIN AMERICA 
             11.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: MARKET DRIVERS
             11.6.2 LATIN AMERICA: RECESSION IMPACT
             11.6.3 LATIN AMERICA: REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
             11.6.4 BRAZIL 
             11.6.5 MEXICO
             11.6.6 REST OF LATIN AMERICA
 
12 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 
     12.1 INTRODUCTION 
     12.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN 
     12.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS 
     12.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS OF THE TOP MARKET PLAYERS 
     12.5 COMPANY EVALUATION & FINANCIAL METRICS 
     12.6 BRAND/ PRODUCT COMPARISON  
     12.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023 
             12.7.1 STARS
             12.7.2 EMERGING LEADERS
             12.7.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
             12.7.4 PARTICIPANTS
             12.7.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
                       12.7.5.1 Company Footprint
                       12.7.5.2 Region Footprint
                       12.7.5.3 Offering Footprint
                       12.7.5.4 Deployment Mode Footprint
                       12.7.5.5 Vertical Footprint
     12.8 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: START-UP/SME, 2023 
             12.8.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
             12.8.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
             12.8.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
             12.8.4 STARTING BLOCKS
             12.8.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING 
                       12.8.5.1 Detailed List of Key Startups/SMEs
                       12.8.5.2 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Startups/SMEs
     12.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO AND TRENDS 
             12.9.1 NEW PRODUCT LAUNCHES AND PRODUCT ENHANCEMENTS
             12.9.2 DEALS
 
13 COMPANY PROFILES 
     13.1 KEY PLAYERS 
             13.1.1 PALO ALTO NETOWORK
             13.1.2 VMWARE
             13.1.3 ZSCALER
             13.1.4 AKAMAI
             13.1.5 MICROSOFT   
             13.1.6 CISCO
             13.1.7 IBM  
             13.2.8 QNEXT
             13.1.9 CITRIX
               13.1.10 CHECK POINT
               13.1.11 TRELLIX 
               13.2.12 FORCEPOINT
               13.2.13 CROWDSTRIKE
               13.2.14 CLOUDFLARE 
               13.2.15 FORTINET
               13.2.16 GOOGLE
     13.2 OTHER KEY PLAYERS 
             13.2.1 ILLUMIO
             13.2.2 ON2IT
             13.2.3 PERIMETER 81
             13.2.4 THREATLOCKER
             13.2.5 TWINGATE
             13.2.6 APPGATE
             13.2.7 ZERO NETWORKS
             13.2.8 ZENTERA
             13.2.9 XAGE
               13.2.10 SKYHIGH SECURITY
 
14 ADJACENT MARKETS 
     14.1 INTRODUCTION TO ADJACENT MARKETS 
     14.2 LIMITATIONS 
     14.3 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET ECOSYSTEM AND ADJACENT MARKETS 
     14.4 ADJACENT MARKET - 1  
     14.5 ADJACENT MARKET - 2 
 
15 APPENDIX 
     15.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE 
     15.2 KNOWLEDGE STORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL 
     15.3 AVAILABLE CUSTOMIZATIONS 
     15.4 RELATED REPORTS 
     15.5 AUTHOR DETAILS 

The market size of zero trust security was ascertained through a range of essential research efforts. A lot of secondary research was done to learn more about the sector. Primary research with industry professionals from all points of the value chain then confirmed these conclusions, hypotheses, and estimates. A variety of strategies, including top-down and bottom-up approaches, were used to estimate the total market size. The market sizes of the various segments and subsegments within the zero trust security market were then determined using market segmentation and data triangulation approaches.

Secondary Research

During the secondary research phase, various sources were looked into to gather information for the study. These secondary sources included annual reports, press releases, investor presentations from Zero Trust Security software and service providers, online forums, accredited publications and white papers. This secondary research was used to get insights into the industry supply chain, key players, market segmentation down to granular level, regional markets and notable developments from market and technology perspective. These findings were then validated through primary sources. Factors considered to estimate regional market size included government and technology initiatives, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) spend, recent market developments and a thorough analysis of major Operational Technology Security solution providers’ market position.

Primary Research

The comprehensive market engineering process employed a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, complemented by various data triangulation methods, to estimate accurately and forecast market trends for overall market segments and subsegments outlined in the report. The report accordingly compiled and presented key insights and information through accurate qualitative and quantitative analyses ran throughout the market engineering process.

After completing the market engineering process, which encloses calculations for market statistics, segmentation breakdowns, market size estimations, forecasts, and data triangulation, thorough primary research was conducted. This primary research gathered, verified, and validated critical numerical data and identified segmentation types, industry trends, and the competitive landscape within the Zero Trust Security market. The primary research was instrumental in elucidating fundamental market dynamics, Including drivers, restraints, opportunities, challenges, industry trends, and strategic initiatives market players adopt.

Following is the breakup of the primary study:

Zero Trust Security Market  Size, and Share

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure

Market Size Estimation

Both top-down and bottom-up methods were implemented to get an accurate picture of the global Zero Trust Security market's size. Also evaluated the sizes of different parts within this bigger market. This approach had several steps:First, Identifying the main players in the market through a lot of background reading. Then, looked at the revenue made in different Regions by the players. To do this, Have gone through reports and spoken to people in charge. Spent time looking at yearly and revenue reports from the top companies. Also had primary interviews with industry leaders like CEOs, VPs, directors, and marketing bosses to learn more. All the numbers about market splits and different parts came from reading reports. Re-ensured these numbers were Accurate by talking to Officials.

INFOGRAPHIC DEPICTING BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES

Zero Trust Security Market  Top Down Approach

To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report

Zero Trust Security Market  Bottom Up Approach

Data Triangulation

Following the determination of the overall market size using the market above size estimation methodologies, the market was segmented into distinct segments and subsegments. Data triangulation and market segmentation procedures were utilized, as needed, to complete the comprehensive market engineering process and ascertain the precise statistics for each market segment and subsegment. Data triangulation was achieved by analyzing various factors and trends from both the demand and supply sides.

Market Definition

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in its current draft of standards for zero trust architecture, defines zero trust in the following manner: “Zero trust is a cybersecurity paradigm focused on resource protection and the premise that trust is never granted implicitly but must be continually evaluated.” Zero trust security is, therefore, not only a product or an approach—it is a web of connected policies, practices, software, and hardware that create an entire zero-trust ecosystem.

According to CrowdStrike, zero trust is a security concept that requires all users, even those inside the organization’s enterprise network, to be authenticated, authorized, and continuously validating security configuration and posture before being granted or keeping access to applications and data.

Further, according to Akamai Technologies, zero trust is a network security model, based on a strict identity verification process. The framework dictates that only authenticated and authorized users and devices can access applications and data. At the same time, it protects those applications and users from advanced threats on the Internet”.

Report Objectives

  • To define, describe, and forecast the Zero Trust Security market based on offering, application, security type, authentication type, vertical, and region.
  • To forecast the market size of five central regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific (APAC), Middle East & Africa (MEA), and Latin America.
  • To analyze the subsegments of the market concerning individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the overall market.
  • To provide detailed information related to the primary factors (drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges) influencing the growth of Zero Trust Security market.
  • To analyze opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying high-growth segments of the Zero Trust Security market.  
  • To profile the key players of the Zero Trust Security market and comprehensively analyze their market size and core competencies.  
  • Track and analyze competitive developments, such as new product launches, mergers and acquisitions, partnerships, agreements, and collaborations in the global Zero Trust Security market.

Customization Options

With the given market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations based on company-specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Geographic Analysis

  • Further breakup of the Asia Pacific market into major countries.
  • Further breakup of the North American market into major countries.
  • Further breakup of the Latin American market into major countries.
  • Further breakup of the Middle East African market into major countries
  • Further breakup of the European market into major countries.

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to 5)
Custom Market Research Services

We will customize the research for you, in case the report listed above does not meet with your exact requirements. Our custom research will comprehensively cover the business information you require to help you arrive at strategic and profitable business decisions.

Request Customization

Instant Answers with GPT - Ask Now!

Ask real questions. Get complete answers !
Report Code
TC 7384
Published ON
Jul, 2024
Choose License Type
BUY NOW
  • SHARE
X
Request Customization
Speak to Analyst
Speak to Analyst
OR FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
PERSONALIZE THIS RESEARCH
  • Triangulate with your Own Data
  • Get Data as per your Format and Definition
  • Gain a Deeper Dive on a Specific Application, Geography, Customer or Competitor
  • Any level of Personalization
REQUEST A FREE CUSTOMIZATION
LET US HELP YOU!
  • What are the Known and Unknown Adjacencies Impacting the Zero Trust Security Market
  • What will your New Revenue Sources be?
  • Who will be your Top Customer; what will make them switch?
  • Defend your Market Share or Win Competitors
  • Get a Scorecard for Target Partners
CUSTOMIZED WORKSHOP REQUEST
knowledgestore logo

Hold On!

Want to explore hidden markets that can drive new revenue in Zero Trust Security Market?

Find Hidden Markets
  • Call Us
  • +1-888-600-6441 (Corporate office hours)
  • +1-888-600-6441 (US/Can toll free)
  • +44-800-368-9399 (UK office hours)
CONNECT WITH US
ABOUT TRUST ONLINE
©2024 MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd. All rights reserved
DMCA.com Protection Status
Website Feedback