Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market by System (Communication System; Navigation System; Human Machine Interface; Flight Control System; Targeting System; Electronic Warfare System; and Sensors), Type & Region - Global Forecast to 2028
The Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market is projected to grow from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 3.7 billion by 2028, at a CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast the forecast period. The market dynamics of defense electronics obsolescence present a unique and evolving landscape, characterized by rapid technological advancements, stringent regulatory requirements, and an ever-present need to maintain, upgrade, and replace aging systems with modern counterparts. This domain is crucial for maintaining national security and defense capabilities, yet it faces numerous challenges including the rapid pace of technological change, budgetary constraints, and the specialized nature of defense electronics.
The defense electronics obsolescence market scope includes replacement demand for obsolete electronic components across marine, airborne, and land platforms arising from the long operational life of defense programs but a shorter life span of electronic components. The Defense Electronics Obsolescence Industry encompasses a wide range of activities, including reverse engineering and retrofitting existing systems with modern components. It also involves collaboration between defense contractors, electronics manufacturers, and research institutions to address the unique challenges faced by the defense sector. Obsolescence in this context pertains to the state where electronic components, technologies, or systems are no longer available, supported, or sustainable due to technological advancements, manufacturing discontinuations, or the unavailability of replacement parts.
Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market Forecast to 2028
To know about the assumptions considered for the study, Request for Free Sample Report
Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market Dynamics:
Driver: Adhering to Stringent Regulatory Requirements and Standards
In the defense electronics obsolescence market, stringent regulatory requirements and standards are pivotal in shaping the lifecycle of systems and components. These regulations, encompassing a wide range of operational, environmental, and interoperability standards, ensure that defense electronics meet the highest levels of reliability and functionality under the most demanding conditions.
The evolution of these standards, such as the transition from MIL-STD-810G to MIL-STD-810H, reflects the ongoing efforts to align defense capabilities with contemporary operational realities and technological advancements. Compliance with these rigorous standards necessitates periodic reviews and upgrades of defense systems, often leading to the obsolescence of older components that cannot meet the new requirements. This regulatory landscape not only drives innovation and quality across the defense sector but also poses challenges for defense contractors and suppliers, who must navigate the complexities of certification and testing processes.
The impact of regulatory standards extends beyond the technical domain, influencing strategic procurement decisions, alliance formations, and defense diplomacy. As global threats evolve and new technologies emerge, regulatory standards will continue to play a crucial role in ensuring that defense electronics are capable of operating in the future battlespace, making compliance a strategic imperative for maintaining competitive advantage and operational effectiveness.
Restraint: High Costs of System Upgrades and Replacement
The substantial economic l burden of upgrading or replacing obsolete components in defense systems represents a significant restraint in the defense electronics obsolescence market. This challenge is not merely about the direct costs of new components but encompasses a broader spectrum of expenses, including research and development for cutting-edge technologies, integration of new components into existing systems, rigorous testing and certification processes, and managing the complexities of global supply chains. These activities demand substantial investment, often running to millions or even billions of dollars for extensive system overhauls. Furthermore, defense budgets are finite and subject to competing priorities, which means that the allocation of funds towards system upgrades and replacements must be carefully balanced against other critical needs, such as new system acquisitions, personnel costs, and maintenance of existing capabilities. This financial restraint is compounded by the long lifecycles of defense platforms, during which technology can advance significantly, leading to a continuous cycle of obsolescence and replacement.
The high costs associated with these upgrades and replacements limit the frequency and extent to which they can be undertaken, forcing defense organizations to make difficult decisions about which systems to modernize and which to maintain with increasingly outdated technology. This dynamic can impact the operational effectiveness of the defense forces, their ability to respond to emerging threats, and ultimately, national security. Addressing this financial restraint requires innovative approaches to managing defense budgets, such as increasing efficiency through modular design, leveraging commercial off-the-shelf technologies where appropriate, and forming strategic partnerships with industry to share the burden of development and production costs.
Opportunity: Strategic Adaptation through Remanufacturing and Reverse Engineering
In the defense electronics obsolescence market, remanufacturing and reverse engineering obsolete components represent a significant opportunity to mitigate the challenges of rapid technological obsolescence. This approach allows defense organizations to extend the operational life of critical systems without the need for comprehensive overhauls, thereby ensuring continuous capability and readiness while managing costs more effectively.
Remanufacturing involves refurbishing and restoring used or outdated components to like-new condition, often enhancing them with the latest technological improvements. This process not only recycles existing materials and parts, reducing waste and environmental impact, but also circumvents the high costs and logistical complexities associated with sourcing new, compatible replacements for obsolete systems. By updating only the necessary components, defense entities can maintain the functionality and reliability of their equipment at a fraction of the cost of acquiring new systems.
Reverse engineering, on the other hand, involves deconstructing and analyzing the design of obsolete components to create new parts that are functionally equivalent or improved. This is particularly valuable when original manufacturers no longer produce a component, or when documentation is lacking. Through reverse engineering, defense organizations can overcome supply chain vulnerabilities and reduce dependence on external suppliers, enhancing their self-reliance and security posture. This opportunity is not without its challenges, including the need for specialized skills and technologies, potential intellectual property issues, and the initial investment required to set up remanufacturing and reverse engineering capabilities. However, by embracing these strategies, defense forces can significantly improve their adaptability to technological change, reduce lifecycle costs, and ensure the sustained effectiveness of their systems in the face of rapid advancements and discontinuations in electronics technology.
Adopting remanufacturing and reverse engineering strategies represents a forward-thinking approach to obsolescence management in the defense sector. It not only addresses the immediate needs for component replacement and system upgrade but also contributes to a more sustainable and cost-effective model for maintaining technological superiority and operational readiness over the long term.
Challenge: Synchronizing System Upgrades and Operational Readiness in Defense Forces
Balancing the modernization of defense systems with maintaining operational readiness is a critical challenge for defense forces. This complex task requires strategic scheduling and meticulous planning to ensure that upgrades or replacements of obsolete components do not impede the forces' immediate availability or combat readiness. The crux of the issue lies in executing system enhancements without creating vulnerabilities, especially given the unpredictable nature of global security threats.
To navigate this challenge, defense organizations often adopt phased or incremental upgrade strategies, allowing for continuous operation albeit at a potentially reduced capacity. This approach minimizes downtime but necessitates rigorous logistical coordination and risk management to ensure that any temporary reductions in capability do not compromise overall defense posture. Furthermore, integrating new technologies into existing frameworks demands not only technical finesse to ensure compatibility and maintain system integrity but also a keen focus on training and adaptation for personnel. The workforce must be proficient with the updated systems from the get-go, requiring targeted training programs that align with the upgrade timelines. Successfully addressing this challenge is pivotal for defense forces aiming to stay at the technological forefront while remaining fully prepared to meet operational demands and security challenges head-on.
Based on system, the targeting system segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period.
The defense electronics obsolescence market has been classified into communication system; navigation system; human machine interface; flight control system; targeting system; electronic warfare system; and Sensors. In military applications, radars form the backbone of sophisticated targeting systems, offering invaluable capabilities for situational awareness and threat identification. For instance, AN/TPY-2 radar used in ballistic missile defence systems, play a crucial role in detecting and tracking incoming missile threats. These radars provide early warning and tracking data to facilitate the interception of ballistic missiles, helping to protect critical assets and population centers from potential attacks.
Based on platform, irborne segment will dominate the market.
The defense electronics obsolescence market has been segmented based on Land, Naval, and Airborne platforms. The airborne category is anticipated to dominate the market due to the significant risk of obsolescence associated with the complex electronics employed by military aircraft, including aerial delivery systems, helmet-mounted displays (HMDs), communication systems, palletized loading systems (PLS), and radars.
The North America region dominates the market during the forecast period.
North America dominates the defense electronics obsolescence market because of its substantial defense spending, cutting-edge technology, and robust industrial base. Leading North American firms are developing advanced obsolescence management strategies tailored to the unique requirements of various platforms, with a focus on ground, marine, and aerial systems. North American companies innovate in obsolescence management, allowing the military to maintain operational readiness and technological dominance. They achieve this by making calculated investments in cooperation, R&D, and R&D. North America is crucial for upholding stability in a geopolitical context that is becoming more complicated and for protecting national security interests because it is the leader in the defense electronics obsolescence sector.
Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market by Region
To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure
Key Market Players
The major players in the Defense Electronics Obsolescence Companies are Raytheon Technologies Corporation (US), BAE Systems (UK), L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (US), Thales (US) and Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel). These players have adopted various growth strategies expand their presence in the defense electronics obsolescence market.
Get online access to the report on the World's First Market Intelligence Cloud
- Easy to Download Historical Data & Forecast Numbers
- Company Analysis Dashboard for high growth potential opportunities
- Research Analyst Access for customization & queries
- Competitor Analysis with Interactive dashboard
- Latest News, Updates & Trend analysis
Request Sample Scope of the Report
Get online access to the report on the World's First Market Intelligence Cloud
- Easy to Download Historical Data & Forecast Numbers
- Company Analysis Dashboard for high growth potential opportunities
- Research Analyst Access for customization & queries
- Competitor Analysis with Interactive dashboard
- Latest News, Updates & Trend analysis
Report Metric |
Scope |
Estimated Value
|
USD 2.5 Billion in 2023 |
Projected Value | USD 3.7 Billion by 2028 |
Growth Rate | CAGR of 8.2 % |
Market size available for years |
2020-2028 |
Base year considered |
2022 |
Forecast period |
2023-2028 |
Forecast units |
Value (USD) |
Segments Covered |
By System, By Platform, By Type, and By Region |
Geographies covered |
North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, and Middle East. |
Companies covered |
Raytheon Technologies Corporation (US), BAE Systems (UK), L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (US), Thales (US) and Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel). |
Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market Highlights
This research report categorizes the defense electronics obsolescence market based on systems, platform, type, and region.
Segment |
Subsegment |
By Systems |
|
By Platform |
|
By Type |
|
By Region |
|
Recent Developments
- In January 2024, BAE Systems was awarded a contract by the Commonwealth of Australia to upgrade existing Mk 45 Mod 2 naval gun systems on Anzac class frigates with a Common Control System (CCS).
- In October 2023, Collins Aerospace, an Raytheon Technologies Corporation’s business has signed a licensing agreement with South Korean company Hanwha Systems to manufacture airborne tactical radios in South Korea as part of a Second-generation Anti-jam Tactical UHF Radio for NATO waveform (SATURN) upgrade program.
- In September 2023, Collins Aerospace was selected by BAE Systems as Large Area Display provider for Eurofighter Typhoon cockpit development. Collins Aerospace will work with BAE Systems to develop a Large Area Display solution that leverages existing, field-proven design elements while incorporating the latest available display technologies in order to minimise obsolescence and development schedule risks.
- In April 2023, Thales has secured a new contract to bolster French Armed Forces' airspace surveillance with STAR NG and RSM NG radars. As part of the "SCCOA" and "Detection 22" program, Thales will provide next-gen primary and secondary approach radars for French air and naval bases starting in 2025. This contract aims to enhance operational capabilities, address obsolescence concerns, and ensure compliance with regulations while leveraging Thales' leading civilian radar portfolio.
- In December 2023, L3Harris Technologies, Korean Air, and Israel Aerospace Industries’ ELTA Systems Ltd. (IAI/ELTA) joined forces to integrate and deliver the next generation of survivable, high-altitude airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft to the Republic of Korea (ROK) Air Force. L3Harris’ partnerships with Korean Air, LIG Nex1, and Ace Antenna, along with ongoing discussions with additional Korean partners, aim to ensure full support for the aircraft and mission system equipment in Korea. Sustainment, obsolescence management, and integration of future capability upgrades will be led by Korean industry with support from the L3Harris team.
- In April 2023, L3Harris Technologies announced a USD 27 million contract to support NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) Booster Obsolescence and Life Extension program. Developed and manufactured by Northrop Grumman, the solid rocket boosters power the rocket at launch.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):
What is the current size of the defense electronics obsolescence market?
Defense electronics obsolescence market is projected to grow from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 3.7 billion by 2028, at a CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast period.
Who are the winners in the defense electronics obsolescence market?
Raytheon Technologies Corporation (US), BAE Systems (UK), L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (US), Thales (US) and Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel).
What are some of the technological advancements in the market?
- MODULAR OPEN SYSTEMS APPROACH (MOSA): The Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) facilitates easier component upgrades and replacements through design modularity and open standards, significantly mitigating obsolescence risks. A notable example is the US Navy's adoption of MOSA principles in its Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP).
- ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING (3D PRINTING): Additive manufacturing (AM) offers a solution to obsolescence by enabling the on-demand production of parts that are no longer in production. This technology can produce components that are out of stock or have been discontinued, reducing the lead time and cost associated with finding and procuring scarce parts. Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly known as 3D printing, is a revolutionary technology that builds objects layer by layer from digital models.
What are the factors driving the growth of the market?
- Rapid Technological Advancements
- Stringent Regulatory Requirements and Standards
- Supply Chain Disruptions
Which region is expected to hold highest market share in the defense electronics obsolescence market?
Defense electronics obsolescence market in the North America region is estimated to hold the largest market share of 56% of the total market in 2023.
To speak to our analyst for a discussion on the above findings, click Speak to Analyst
This research study on the defense electronics obsolescence involves the extensive use of secondary sources, directories, and databases, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg, Crunchbase, BusinessWeek, and Factiva, to identify and collect information relevant to the market. The primary sources considered include industry experts, as well as manufacturers, system providers, technology developers, alliances, and organizations related to all segments of the value chain of this defense electronics industry. In-depth interviews with various primary respondents, including key industry participants, subject-matter experts (SME), industry consultants, and C-level executives, have been conducted to obtain and verify critical qualitative and quantitative information pertaining to the market, as well as to assess its growth prospects.
Secondary Research
The ranking analysis of companies in the defense electronics obsolescence has been determined using secondary data from paid and unpaid sources and analyzing the product/services/solutions portfolios of major companies operating in the market. These companies have been rated based on the performance and diversification of their products. Primary sources further validate these data points.
Secondary sources referred for this research study include financial statements of companies offering defense electronics obsolescence for all respective systems stages, such as human machine interface, targeting systems, electronic warfare system, communications systems, navigation systems, flight control systems and sensors, along with various trade, business, and professional associations. The secondary data has been collected and analysed to arrive at the overall size of the market, which has been validated by primary respondents.
Primary Research
Extensive primary research has been conducted after obtaining information about the current scenario of the defense electronics obsolescence through secondary research. Several primary interviews have been conducted with market experts from the demand and supply sides across five regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East. This primary data has been collected through questionnaires, emails, and telephonic interviews.
To know about the assumptions considered for the study, download the pdf brochure
Market Size Estimation
Both the top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the size of the market. The research methodology used to estimate the market size also includes the following details:
- Key players have been identified through secondary research, and their market ranking has been determined through primary and secondary research. This includes a study of annual and financial reports of the top market players and extensive interviews of leaders, including CEOs, directors, and marketing executives.
- All percentage splits and trends have been determined using secondary sources and verified through primary sources. All possible parameters that affect the market covered in this research study have been accounted for, viewed in extensive detail, verified through primary research, and analyzed to obtain the final quantitative and qualitative data. This data has been consolidated, enhanced with detailed inputs, analyzed by MarketsandMarkets, and presented in this report.
Market Size Estimation Methodology: Bottom-Up Approach
Market Size Estimation Methodology: Top-Down Approach
Data Triangulation
After arriving at the overall market size, the total market has been split into several segments and subsegments. The data triangulation and market breakdown procedures explained below have been implemented, wherever applicable, to complete the overall market engineering process and arrive at the exact statistics for various market segments and subsegments. The data has been triangulated by studying various factors and trends from both the demand and supply sides. Along with this, the market size has been validated using both the top-down and bottom-up approaches.
Market Definition
?The defense electronics obsolescence market scope includes replacement demand for obsolete electronic components across marine, airborne, and land platforms arising from the long operational life of defense programs but a shorter life span of electronic components. The defense electronics obsolescence market encompasses a wide range of activities, including reverse engineering and retrofitting existing systems with modern components. It also involves collaboration between defense contractors, electronics manufacturers, and research institutions to address the unique challenges faced by the defense sector. Obsolescence in this context pertains to the state where electronic components, technologies, or systems are no longer available, supported, or sustainable due to technological advancements, manufacturing discontinuations, or the unavailability of replacement parts.
STAKEHOLDERS
- Government Authorities
- Regulatory Bodies
- R&D Companies
- Subsystem Manufacturers
- Electronic Component Manufacturers
- Electronic System Providers
- Platform Manufacturers
- Re-engineering Component and Sub-component Providers
- Armed Forces.
Report Objectives
- To define, describe, and forecast the defense electronics obsolescence market based on system, platform, and type from 2023 to 2028
- To forecast the size of various segments of the market with respect to major regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East.
- To identify and analyze key drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges influencing the growth of the market
- To strategically analyze micromarkets1 with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and their contribution to the market
- To analyze opportunities for stakeholders in the market by identifying key market trends
- To analyze competitive developments such as contracts, acquisitions, agreements, and product launches in the market
- To provide a detailed competitive landscape of the market, in addition to an analysis of business and corporate strategies adopted by leading market players
- To strategically profile key market players and comprehensively analyze their core competencies.
Available customizations
Along with the market data, MarketsandMarkets offers customizations as per the specific needs of companies. The following customization options are available for the report:
Product Analysis
- Product matrix, which gives a detailed comparison of the product portfolio of each company
Regional Analysis
- Further breakdown of the market segments at country-level
Company Information
- Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to 5)
Growth opportunities and latent adjacency in Defense Electronics Obsolescence Market